MARINESHELF publishes articles contributed by seafarers and other marine related sites solely for the benefit of seafarers .All copyright materials are owned by its respective authors or publishers.
Requirements for a
monitor.
The oil pollution
regulations put limitations on the quantity of oil discharged into the sea.
There can be a
requirement to monitor the overboard discharge for oil from:‑
A tanker ballast line as it
discharges directly overboard
A tanker ballast discharge after an
oil/water separator
The bilge discharge from the
machinery space of any ship.
General
Specification Requirements.
Must be suitable
for the marine environment (accurate
laboratory methods are well tried and tested but not all can be used on board
ship).
Suitable for
reading both high and low levels of contamination and to respond fast to sudden
changes in those levels.
Effect due to the
presence of sand, rust and other debris, should be minimal
Must operate
irrespective of the type of oil (or at least be capable of calibration to allow
for this factor.)
Must be easy to
operate and maintain
Should be
unaffected by considerable periods of idleness
Accurate to about ±
10%
Principles Of
Measurement.
Conductivity
Capacitance
Acoustic Attenuation
Sonic Impedance
Infra
Red Absorption
Ultra Violet Absorption
Visible Light Absorption
Visible Light Scattering
Ultra Violet Fluorescence
The first four are
all poor with respect to sensitivity and would usually be used only to detect
oil‑water interfaces (in an oil/water separator)
Infra Red
absorption is potentially the most promising method as most oils absorb in the
3.4 μm wavelength. The variation in absorption rates between heavy oils through
to the light diesels is only approximately 10%.
However water also
has a strong absorption at the same wavelength and this makes detectors using
this technique complex.
The latest view is,
that it would be useful if the oil was extracted from the water with a suitable
solvent, the solvent having no absorption of the infra red wavelength. However
this would not allow a speedy response.
Ultra Violet
absorption does not encounter the water absorption problem as it uses a
wavelength of 0.254 μm but the requirement, for the opto‑electronics to detect
small changes in a high light level, limits the low range capability.
Absorption devices
using any wavelength, on a system where the oil is present in the form of
particles, suffers from the effects of sand, rust etc. distorting the accuracy.
This is significant and adds greatly to the problem of inaccuracies.
Devices using
visible light are usually cheaper, simpler and are non‑specific with respect to
oil types. However, they also detect, without distinguishing between, oil and
non‑oil particles of similar diameter.
Of the two visible
light techniques scattering is the most sensitive.
Ultra Violet
fluorescence suffers from a wide variation in response to different types of
oil.
Ballast Monitor.
A representative
sample must be extracted. This is achieved by a strengthened intrusion pipe in
the ballast line and the sample is then conveyed to the monitor by a pump.
After the
measurement the sample can be discharged overboard or be put back into the
ballast line.
To ensure a
representative sample is obtained and to encourage good mixing, the sample
point is usually in the middle of the ballast pipe, near to the discharge pump.
Care must be taken to ensure the ballast line is always full so that no settling
out occurs.
If the response
time of the monitoring system is lengthy then considerable pollution can occur
before the large discharge valves can be closed.
Additionally it is
important that the operation of the valves should not be initiated by a
spurious result caused by a small spike of oil exceeding the alarm level.
Generally the
response of the monitor is instantaneous and most of the system response delay
is in the sampling pipework.
To reduce the
delay, short lengths of sample pipe with a minimum number of bends, utilizing a
fast sample velocity are adopted.
This pipework often
becomes clogged during periods of inactivity and, when restarted, erroneous
readings are obtained as oil, deposited during periods of idleness, strips off
the pipework.
Development work on the original design indicated the
means for the practical arrangement of an oil content meter which are still
applicable to most instruments. As an oil content meter must necessarily
contain hydrocarbons, which may appear in such concentrations that a hazard
exists, and furthermore, as the measuring technique is likely to involve using
electrical equipment in one form or another, there is always an intricate
problem in isolating the electrical side from the hazardous area. The solution,
adopted by Bailey in the original instrument, entailed mounting the analyzing
equipment on the bulkhead between the pumproom and the safe spaces in such a
way that the optical sensors can work through lenses in the gas-tight barrier,
is common to all instruments.
They generally also
require a pump for the sample water, which is normally mounted to the pump-room
bulkhead and driven by an electric motor on the engine-room side.
The Classification
Societies' rules concerning the safety of such installations may eventually
become part of the IMO guidelines. Subject to certain conditions, these
installation rules also permit the analyzing equipment to be placed in a
gas-tight casing mounted in a safe area such as the cargo control room. The
casing must be purge-ventilated to the outside air, and certain other safety
precautions must be observed.
Most monitors
depend on an optical technique and this leads to problems with the sealing and
cleaning of the optical windows. A fast sample flow rate helps in keeping the
windows clean.
Bilge Monitor
The installation
and operational problems with a bilge monitor are less than those for the
ballast monitor.
The bilge monitor
must provide a simple alarm after the separator/coalescer at 15 p.p.m.
With the bilge
system the type of oil can vary from fuel oils to lubricating oils hence the
monitor should not be specific to oil type.
Turbidity meters
(Scattered Light
Detector)
If an oil/water
mixture with a low oil content is heavily agitated so that the oil droplets
become very small, the water will turn 'milky' to varying degrees, depending on
the amount of oil present; the actual colour of the oil droplets is of no
importance.
This method can be
used for indicating the oil content, provided the conditions for homogenizing
the sample are well controlled. If a light beam is projected through a test
cell containing sample water with well-homogenized droplets, part of the light
passing through the cell will be scattered. The intensity of light picked up by
a photocell at the end of a straight path through the cell will be reduced,
whereas the intensity of scattered light sensed by a photocell mounted at an
angle to the original path will increase.
Laser light may be
used to obtain a well defined light beam and possibly a selective
light-scattering effect.
This principle is
used in one oil content meter currently available, in which the light beam and
the signals picked up by the photocells are transmitted via optical fibres to
the electronic part in the engine-room, thereby making the bulkhead
penetrations quite small.
A similar
instrument, operating with infra-red light, is also available.
A third instrument,
based on the turbidity principle, operates only on the direct transmitted
light through the test cell in which the heavily agitated sample water
circulates.
Instruments of this
type can measure oils ranging from heavy crude oils to gasoline, but some
changes in the calibration are required to cover the extremes of the range. As
the instruments measure the number of particles in the water, they are rather
sensitive to other contaminants such as rust or air bubbles.
No comments:
Post a Comment