WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF SHIPS AND MERCHANT NAVY THIS SITE IS A MARITIME BLOG AND WILL DEAL MAINLY WITH RESPECT TO SHIPS AND ALL THAT RELATES TO SHIPS AND MERCHANT NAVY ;YOUR VIEWS AND SUGGESTIONS AND ARTICLES ARE IMPORTANT TO ME FOR HELPING THE NEW GENERATION OF SEAFARERS ;KINDLY COME OUT WITH YOUR IDEAS AND HELP THIS SMALL VENTURE TO GROW AND HELP ALL SEAFARERS OUT THERE.KINDLY NOTE ALL ARTICLES ARE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM FRIENDS AND OTHER SOURCES HENCE KINDLY CORRECT ME IF YOU FIND ANY MISTAKES.
Friday, March 28, 2014
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
RT -FLEX ENGINES
MARINESHELF publishes articles contributed by seafarers and other marine related sites solely for the benefit of seafarers .All copyright materials are owned by its respective authors or publishers.
The Wärtsilä RT-flex50 low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine:
common-rail system for fuel injection.
common rail system for exhaust valve actuation, and
full electronic control of these engine functions
instead of the traditional mechanical camshaft system.
Benefits:
Smokeless operation at all operating speeds
Lower steady running speeds, in the range of 10–15 per cent nominal speed, obtained smokelessly through sequential shut-off of injectors while continuing to run on all cylinders.
Reduced running costs through reduced part-load fuel consumption and longer times between overhauls
Simpler setting of the engine. The ‘as-new’ running settings are automatically maintained.
Reduced maintenance costs through precise volumetric fuel injection control leading to extendable times between overhauls.
The common-rail system with its volumetric control gives excellent balance in engine power developed between cylinders and between cycles, with precise injection timing and equalised thermal loads
Reliability is given by long-term testing of common-rail hardware in component test rigs.
Higher availability owing to the integrated monitoring functions.
High availability also given by the built-in redundancy, provided by the ample capacity and duplication in the supply pumps, main delivery pipes, crank-angle sensors, electronic control units and other key elements.
The common rail for fuel injection is a single-piece pipe running the length of the engine at just below the cylinder cover level.
The common rail and other related pipe work are arranged beneath the top engine platform and readily accessible from above.
The common rail is fed with heated fuel oil at the usual high pressure (nominally 1000 bar) ready for injection.
The supply unit for the fuel has a number of high-pressure pumps actuated by cams driven through gearing from the crankshaft.
Fuel is delivered from this common rail through a
separate injection control unit (ICU), mounted directly on the rail, for each engine cylinder to the standard fuel injection valves which are operated in the usual way by the high-pressure fuel oil.
Using quick-acting Wärtsilä rail valves, they regulate the timing of fuel injection, control the
volume of fuel injected, and set the shape of the injection pattern.
Each ICU serves the two fuel injection valves in its corresponding cylinder cover.
Each injection valve is separately controlled so that, although they normally act in unison, they can also be programmed to operate
separately as necessary.
The exhaust valves are operated in the same way as in RTA engines by a hydraulic pushrod but actuating energy now comes from a servo oil rail at 200 bar pressure.
The servo oil is supplied by high-pressure hydraulic pumps incorporated in the supply unit with the fuel supply pumps. The electronically-controlled actuating unit for each cylinder gives full flexibility for setting the timing of valve opening and closing.
All functions in the RT-flex system are controlled and monitored through the integrated Wärtsilä WECS-9520 electronic control system.
This is a modular system with a separate FCM-20 microprocessor control unit for each cylinder.
An additional FCM-20 unit provides all connections to other systems such as the remote control and alarm systems.
Lower turbocharger efficiencies at part load normally result in low excess combustion air with fixed valve timing.
Another important contribution to fuel economy of the RT-flex50 engines is the capability to adapt easily the injection timing to various fuel properties having a poor combustion behaviour.
Exhaust gas emissions have become an important aspect of marine diesel engines. All Wärtsilä RTA and RT-flex engines as standard comply with the NOX emissions limit set by IMO in Annex VI of the MARPOL 73/78 convention.
RT-flex engines, however, come comfortably below this NOX limit by virtue of their extremely wide flexibility in optimising the fuel injection and exhaust
valve processes.
A visible benefit of RT-flex engines is their smokeless operation at all ship speeds.
The superior combustion with the common-rail system is largely because the fuel injection pressure is maintained at the optimum level irrespective of engine speed.
At very low speeds, individual fuel injectors are selectively shut off and the exhaust valve timing adapted to help to keep smoke emissions below the visible limit.
The Wärtsilä RT-flex50 low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine:
common-rail system for fuel injection.
common rail system for exhaust valve actuation, and
full electronic control of these engine functions
instead of the traditional mechanical camshaft system.
Benefits:
Smokeless operation at all operating speeds
Lower steady running speeds, in the range of 10–15 per cent nominal speed, obtained smokelessly through sequential shut-off of injectors while continuing to run on all cylinders.
Reduced running costs through reduced part-load fuel consumption and longer times between overhauls
Simpler setting of the engine. The ‘as-new’ running settings are automatically maintained.
Reduced maintenance costs through precise volumetric fuel injection control leading to extendable times between overhauls.
The common-rail system with its volumetric control gives excellent balance in engine power developed between cylinders and between cycles, with precise injection timing and equalised thermal loads
Reliability is given by long-term testing of common-rail hardware in component test rigs.
Higher availability owing to the integrated monitoring functions.
High availability also given by the built-in redundancy, provided by the ample capacity and duplication in the supply pumps, main delivery pipes, crank-angle sensors, electronic control units and other key elements.
The common rail for fuel injection is a single-piece pipe running the length of the engine at just below the cylinder cover level.
The common rail and other related pipe work are arranged beneath the top engine platform and readily accessible from above.
The common rail is fed with heated fuel oil at the usual high pressure (nominally 1000 bar) ready for injection.
The supply unit for the fuel has a number of high-pressure pumps actuated by cams driven through gearing from the crankshaft.
Fuel is delivered from this common rail through a
separate injection control unit (ICU), mounted directly on the rail, for each engine cylinder to the standard fuel injection valves which are operated in the usual way by the high-pressure fuel oil.
Using quick-acting Wärtsilä rail valves, they regulate the timing of fuel injection, control the
volume of fuel injected, and set the shape of the injection pattern.
Each ICU serves the two fuel injection valves in its corresponding cylinder cover.
Each injection valve is separately controlled so that, although they normally act in unison, they can also be programmed to operate
separately as necessary.
The exhaust valves are operated in the same way as in RTA engines by a hydraulic pushrod but actuating energy now comes from a servo oil rail at 200 bar pressure.
The servo oil is supplied by high-pressure hydraulic pumps incorporated in the supply unit with the fuel supply pumps. The electronically-controlled actuating unit for each cylinder gives full flexibility for setting the timing of valve opening and closing.
All functions in the RT-flex system are controlled and monitored through the integrated Wärtsilä WECS-9520 electronic control system.
This is a modular system with a separate FCM-20 microprocessor control unit for each cylinder.
An additional FCM-20 unit provides all connections to other systems such as the remote control and alarm systems.
Lower turbocharger efficiencies at part load normally result in low excess combustion air with fixed valve timing.
Another important contribution to fuel economy of the RT-flex50 engines is the capability to adapt easily the injection timing to various fuel properties having a poor combustion behaviour.
Exhaust gas emissions have become an important aspect of marine diesel engines. All Wärtsilä RTA and RT-flex engines as standard comply with the NOX emissions limit set by IMO in Annex VI of the MARPOL 73/78 convention.
RT-flex engines, however, come comfortably below this NOX limit by virtue of their extremely wide flexibility in optimising the fuel injection and exhaust
valve processes.
A visible benefit of RT-flex engines is their smokeless operation at all ship speeds.
The superior combustion with the common-rail system is largely because the fuel injection pressure is maintained at the optimum level irrespective of engine speed.
At very low speeds, individual fuel injectors are selectively shut off and the exhaust valve timing adapted to help to keep smoke emissions below the visible limit.
Monday, March 24, 2014
VIT AND SUPER VIT A DISCUSSION
MARINESHELF publishes articles contributed by seafarers and other marine related sites solely for the benefit of seafarers .All copyright materials are owned by its respective authors or publishers.
Am I right in assuming break point is where max cylinder pressure has been reached before MCR which is about 85% MCR when using VIT, after which injection timing is retarded back to its original setting at 100% MCR
Also, does the MAN B&W engine have a fuel quality setting lever on the VIT control similar to that used on the Sulzer RTA, or must the fuel pumps be adjusted individually if a fuel of differing ignition quality is bunkered.
if i am not wrong, the vit pilot line pressure increases to approx 3 kg at break point and then reduces till the mcr keeping the pmax const.
i would like to draw your attention to the inlet pressure of this vit pilot valve which is 7 kg (control line pr).
i had experienced sticking of this pilot valve and full 7 kg outlet pressure was fed to the servo positioners. luckily it was noticed immediately and corrective actions were taken.
suppose this had happened during ums period in an engine room, would any enine alarm sound?
what would the peak pressure be during that limited time with pilot line pressure at 7 kg and an engine operating at 90 % mcr?
Modern
large slow speed MAN B&W 2-stroke engines have Super VIT mechanism fitted
to advance fuel injection at lower loads for increasing maximum firing pressure
resulting better fuel economy. Details of Super VIT are available in the engine
manuals.
Why use the term "Super"? was there an "ordinary" VIT earlier, which has been changed to Super VIT?
If yes, can I have a brief description of how the ordinary (non-Super) VIT worked?
Why use the term "Super"? was there an "ordinary" VIT earlier, which has been changed to Super VIT?
If yes, can I have a brief description of how the ordinary (non-Super) VIT worked?
Before
the Super VIT was introduced variable injection timing was obtained by means of
a special profile on the fuel pump plunger. Hence there was a fixed
relationship between the injection timing and the fuel index. Thus it was not possible to adjust the
fuel index of the individual pumps without also altering the injection timing. For this reason the
Super VIT was introduced, where it is possible to adjust the fuel index and the injection
timing independently.
Is
it possible to achieve Super VIT action by means of mechanical linkage or can
it be only done if we have electronic (microprocessor) controlled fuel
injection system. Or is it right to say that most efficient Super VIT can only
be achieved by electronic fuel injection?
The
Super VIT is available in both a mechanical and an electronic version. In the
electronic version an I/P converter supplies the pilot air pressure to the
individual servo cylinders, instead of the pilot valve activated by the fuel
rack used in the mechanical version. The I/P converter receives its pilot
signal from the governor system.
The advantage of the electronic version is that the break-point is calculated from the actual conditions, why the ambient conditions are taken into account. The engine load is calculated from the engine speed and the fuel index, while the compression pressure is calculated from the scavenging air pressure. Based on these calculations the governor calculates the output to the I/P converter
The advantage of the electronic version is that the break-point is calculated from the actual conditions, why the ambient conditions are taken into account. The engine load is calculated from the engine speed and the fuel index, while the compression pressure is calculated from the scavenging air pressure. Based on these calculations the governor calculates the output to the I/P converter
Am I right in assuming break point is where max cylinder pressure has been reached before MCR which is about 85% MCR when using VIT, after which injection timing is retarded back to its original setting at 100% MCR
Also, does the MAN B&W engine have a fuel quality setting lever on the VIT control similar to that used on the Sulzer RTA, or must the fuel pumps be adjusted individually if a fuel of differing ignition quality is bunkered.
The
breakpoint is the point where the maximum cylinder pressure has been reached
and the injection timing is advanced the most. Above the breakpoint the
injection timing is gradually retarded back until it reaches its original
setting at 100% MCR load. The position of the breakpoint is determined by the
layout of the engine. Formerly it was generally considered to be at
approximately 85% MCR load, but it also has to be ensured that the maximum
pressure rise from compression to maximum cylinder pressure is 35 bar or less
(recommended by MAN B&W Diesel A/S). For this reason the breakpoint has
tended to be somewhat higher on the latest engines (approximately 90% MCR
load).
In order to compensate for fuel related differences in the maximum cylinder pressure it is possible to adjust the VIT according to the experience with the different fuels.
In case of the mechanical VIT an offset is introduced by moving the pilot valve bracket horizontally towards or away from the lever, by means of the adjusting screws.
In case of the electronic VIT it is possible to adjust an offset value on the governor panel.
In order to compensate for fuel related differences in the maximum cylinder pressure it is possible to adjust the VIT according to the experience with the different fuels.
In case of the mechanical VIT an offset is introduced by moving the pilot valve bracket horizontally towards or away from the lever, by means of the adjusting screws.
In case of the electronic VIT it is possible to adjust an offset value on the governor panel.
What
the term fuel index and how is it adjusted?
The
fuel index is an indication of the active stroke of the fuel pump. This is
controlled by push rods on the individual fuel pumps connected to the fuel
rack, which in turn is controlled by the engine governor.
When the engine is given a speed command the governor increases the fuel index, subject to certain limitations, untill the requested engine speed is reached
When the engine is given a speed command the governor increases the fuel index, subject to certain limitations, untill the requested engine speed is reached
if i am not wrong, the vit pilot line pressure increases to approx 3 kg at break point and then reduces till the mcr keeping the pmax const.
i would like to draw your attention to the inlet pressure of this vit pilot valve which is 7 kg (control line pr).
i had experienced sticking of this pilot valve and full 7 kg outlet pressure was fed to the servo positioners. luckily it was noticed immediately and corrective actions were taken.
suppose this had happened during ums period in an engine room, would any enine alarm sound?
what would the peak pressure be during that limited time with pilot line pressure at 7 kg and an engine operating at 90 % mcr?
If
the servo signal increases way beyond the normal operating range, e.g. as you
state the worst case is equal to the control system pressure of 7 bar, this
will naturally result in an increased pressure rise from the compression
pressure to the maximum pressure.
No alarm is provided for this malfunction, as it does not directly influence the operation of the engine. The increased pressure rise will actually improve the performance of the engine, but will over time overstress the piston rings. If such a condition is allowed to exist for a long time, cylinder condition problems are thus likely to occur. However, an abnormal servo signal ought to be discovered by the engine crew during their routine inspection rounds - even with the engine room under UMS conditions.
No alarm is provided for this malfunction, as it does not directly influence the operation of the engine. The increased pressure rise will actually improve the performance of the engine, but will over time overstress the piston rings. If such a condition is allowed to exist for a long time, cylinder condition problems are thus likely to occur. However, an abnormal servo signal ought to be discovered by the engine crew during their routine inspection rounds - even with the engine room under UMS conditions.
But if we observe the VIT index at break point, this would be around 6 notch
and the peak pressure developed at this point would be the design 140 bar in
the cylinder. If 7 bar is admitted to the servo the VIT index becomes around 14
notch. and as each notch gives an increase in peak pressure of 1 bar, the peak
pressure may exceed by 8 bars. this difference may increase more if the engine
is operated above the break point. Wouldn’t this effect the load on the
bearings and other running gear if the engine is operated in this condition for
more than 8 hrs.
My doubt is , why isn’t a reducer fitted before the vit pilot valve, when the max pressure needed is 3.5 bars, which is given during engine starting and astern movements.
the data above are speculated and may not be fully correct, please correct if wrong.
My doubt is , why isn’t a reducer fitted before the vit pilot valve, when the max pressure needed is 3.5 bars, which is given during engine starting and astern movements.
the data above are speculated and may not be fully correct, please correct if wrong.
The
actual VIT index at the break point depends on a variety of factors, e.g. fuel
properties and ambient conditions. The latter is taken into account in the
calculations of the electronic VIT version, as the scavenging pressure is used
in the calculations. Consequently, it is not possible to state default values
for the VIT index break point setting or rate of change.
In any case, the mechanical limits of the VIT system also have to be considered. The travel of the servo actuators is designed to be going from a minimum at a servo signal of 0.5 bar to a maximum at a servo signal of 5.0 bar, why the mechanical limit is reached earlier than a servo signal of 7 bar would otherwise indicate. In case of the mechanical VIT system, the break point is determined by the point where the lever rests on both pivot points. In this case it is not possible to depress the pressure adjusting valve further, thus preventing a too high servo signal as the control air inlet will always press the piston of the pressure adjusting valve against the lever.
Even if the maximum pressure is over the specified maximum, the engine is not overloaded due to this. The engine load is determined by the power required to turn the propeller at the requested revolutions and a malfunction of the VIT system does not change this and e.g. the auxiliary systems are not affected by this either. Consequently, the only real impact on the engine is the increased pressure differential over the piston rings, due to the too high pressure rise from the compression pressure to the maximum pressure, and a very limited increase to the bearing load.
As stated earlier, the over stressing of the piston rings may possibly require maintenance, if the malfunction is allowed to persist, but does not affect the possibility to safely manoeuvre the engine. Hence, it has not been deemed necessary to introduce an alarm or other measures to prevent or limit the duration of such a malfunction.
In any case, the mechanical limits of the VIT system also have to be considered. The travel of the servo actuators is designed to be going from a minimum at a servo signal of 0.5 bar to a maximum at a servo signal of 5.0 bar, why the mechanical limit is reached earlier than a servo signal of 7 bar would otherwise indicate. In case of the mechanical VIT system, the break point is determined by the point where the lever rests on both pivot points. In this case it is not possible to depress the pressure adjusting valve further, thus preventing a too high servo signal as the control air inlet will always press the piston of the pressure adjusting valve against the lever.
Even if the maximum pressure is over the specified maximum, the engine is not overloaded due to this. The engine load is determined by the power required to turn the propeller at the requested revolutions and a malfunction of the VIT system does not change this and e.g. the auxiliary systems are not affected by this either. Consequently, the only real impact on the engine is the increased pressure differential over the piston rings, due to the too high pressure rise from the compression pressure to the maximum pressure, and a very limited increase to the bearing load.
As stated earlier, the over stressing of the piston rings may possibly require maintenance, if the malfunction is allowed to persist, but does not affect the possibility to safely manoeuvre the engine. Hence, it has not been deemed necessary to introduce an alarm or other measures to prevent or limit the duration of such a malfunction.
ENERGY AUDIT
MARINESHELF publishes articles contributed by seafarers and other marine related sites solely for the benefit of seafarers .All copyright materials are owned by its respective authors or publishers.
What is an Energy Audit ?
An energy audit is a preliminary activity towards instituting
energy efficiency programs in an establishment. It consists of activities
that seek to identify conservation opportunities preliminary to the
development of an energy savings program.
The Role of an Energy Audit
To institute the correct energy efficiency programs, you have
to know first which areas in your establishment unnecessarily consume too
much energy, e.g. which is the most cost-effective to improve. An energy
audit identifies where energy is being consumed and assesses energy saving
opportunities - so you get to save money where it counts the most.
In the factory, doing an energy audit increases awareness of
energy issues among plant personnel, making them more knowledgeable about
proper practices that will make them more productive. An energy audit in
effect gauges the energy efficiency of your plant against “best practices”.
When used as a “baseline” for tracking yearly progress against targets, an energy
audit becomes the best first step towards saving money in the production
plant.
Contents of an Audit
An energy audit seeks to document things that are sometimes
ignored in the plant, such as the energy being used on site per year, which
processes use the energy, and the opportunities for savings. In so doing, it
assesses the effectiveness of management structure for controlling energy use
and implementing changes. The energy audit report establishes the needs for
plant metering and monitoring, enabling the plant manager to institutionalize
the practice and hence, save money for the years to come. The energy audit
action plan lists the steps and sets the preliminary budget for the energy
management program.
1. Analysis of energy use
Identifying where energy is used is useful because it
identifies which areas the audit should focus on and raises awareness of
energy use and cost. The results of the analysis can be used in the review of
management structures and procedures for controlling energy use.
Analysis of energy use can be done by installing submeters in
different plant locations to pinpoint actual energy usage per area. This is a
good source data for allocating energy use. The plant manager can also list
all equipment used and the corresponding operating hours. With this
information, he can create spreadsheet information and generate charts useful
for analysis.
Important Points to Consider When Collecting Site Load Data
a.
Operating hours - This can be gathered from plant personnel.
It is important to ensure the accuracy of this data because much of the
potential for energy savings lies on correct estimation of the equipment’s
operating hours.
b.
Duty cycle - Machines such as large electric motors have
varying loads and hence, different power requirements.
c.
Actual power consumed - For electric power users, this is
based on either 3-phase current/voltage readings or power analyzer
measurements (e.g., direct kW which incorporates power factor). For fuel
users, tank readings of monthly consumption estimates and flow meters with
totalization can be sources of measurement.
2. Identification of energy projects
Opportunities for energy savings can range from the simplest,
such as lighting retrofits, to the most complex such as the installation of a
cogeneration plant. The important thing to remember is to focus on major
energy users and areas. Always apply the 80/20 rule, focus on opportunities
that provide 80% of the saving but require 20% input. After the preliminary
identification of opportunities, spend more time on those which have shorter
payback periods.
3. Cost benefit analysis
The identified energy conservation opportunities should be
analyzed in terms of the costs of implementing the project versus the
benefits that can be gained. If you want to, say, install a heat plate
exchanger to recover waste heat, you need to calculate the total cost of
installation and compare that with the savings you will derive from
recovering waste heat. It makes sense to go on with the project if there is a
net positive benefit from the project.
4. Action plan to set implementation priority
After passing the cost benefit test, an action plan should be
developed to ensure that the opportunities identified are implemented. The
action plan should include all the major steps for implementing the
opportunity as well as the people responsible. Furthermore, there should be a
plan for monitoring the results.
|
STABILITY DEFINITIONS
MARINESHELF publishes articles contributed by seafarers and other marine related sites solely for the benefit of seafarers .All copyright materials are owned by its respective authors or publishers.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)